|
Site About News Publications Workshop FAQ Projects |
| Web Groups Bodies Conferneces Projects People | |
| Members ACCA ACCAMembersOnly |
| Web: Bodies:
|
Welcome to Autonomic Communication - a new communication paradigm for evolving Internet |
| under
construction |
|
| News News
News
& Highlights |
|||
|
14.07.04: Workshop on Autonomic Communication (WAC2004) extends paper submission deadline until 21.JULY.2004 12:00 CET<more> J-SAC Call for Papers [DL: 01oct04]: Autonomic Communication Systems NeXtworking 2003 report to be published soon: service composition theory is among major findings FET Programme is to launch a
new proactive initiative as part of of its Communication Paradigms for 2020 AC: beyond IETF
AC: beyond XG
AC: beyond IRTF
AC: beyond NewArch
AC: beyond WS-CDL
AC: beyond WWRF
|
|||
|
The European Commission (Programme
IST-FET) and the US National Science Foundation
Autonomic Communication: was selected by ERCIM as a contributor to its long-term program, in particular to the area of Software-Intensive Systems (SIS); AC-oriented contribution will be made at SIS workshop 09-10.09.2005 (within SEFM 2005) that is being organised by SIS are of the Beyond the Horizon project. Report from the previous SIS workshop is here. |
|
IETF
is engineering solutions for
operational Internet to ensure its further growth and usage. The
guiding principle the Internet architects are preserving is
known as End-to-End (E2E) principle; it
attempts to facilitate
innovation by rejecting
[unnecessary] functionality placement within the network. However
all-purpose deployment of the Internet that started in
early 1990s has greatly challenged the
dominance of the E2E principle. Significant
amount of IETF effort is currently
devoted to non-E2E engineering, such
as firewalls, network
address (NAT)
and protocol translators (PT), and to
their traversal, to signalling, transport and
content
caching
proxies, etc. The largest ever attempt to fix
the Internet model was undertaken by IPng working
group in standardising IPv6, that however is currently need
itself multiple fixes to meet the reality challenge
(multi-homing, mobility, QoS, midcom, etc.).
Emerging understanding among Internet users and designers is
that IPv6 is just another addressing realm, while in future
networking reality the co-existence of multiple
addressing realms is mostly probable. Despite the
E2E, more than 20 years of IETF engineering for the
Quality of Service resulted in bringing and keeping more
state (intelligence) within the Net that is probably
comparable with that of Intelligent Networks. This intelligence
needs management, often by complex multi-layer
architectures. The IETF approach to simplify
management is based on policy, which,
following the DMTF
(http://www.dmtf.org) Common Information
Model, has to be based on the
overall top-down description of the
network and by definition is network operator driven.Autonomic Communication recognizes the multiplicity of addressing realms as well as the multiplicity
of communication technologies that will challenge
further any rigid design. The initiative will try to project
existing usage scenarios and trends, especially in
separation of naming and addressing architectures, in
co-existence of heterogeneous networking realms, and in
emergence of new types of communication, such as those
facilitated by sensor networks and ambient intelligence. A very strong emphasis will
be
made on fundamental research in policy-based networking. In
its current incarnations such as security
policy (access control) and device
configuration (for QoS provisioning) the
policy mechanisms lack a number of
needed features, namely controlled interaction
of policies, multiplexing of
policies originated by multiple
communication stakeholders (user,
provider, operator, content, and their network side proxies) and
their automatic and autonomous embedding into respective
functionalities in a safe (conflict-free) and secure
way. AC shall also study self-organisation of ontology
pertaining to different realms. |
|
DARPA
neXt Generation
(XG) communication program is developing the
technology to allow multiple users to share use of the
spectrum through adaptive mechanisms that
deconflict
XG policy
meta-language is
already published as
an RFC.
(local copy [PDF]) users in terms of
time,
frequency, code, and other signal characteristics. DARPA's
goals are to enable an increase of a factor of ten in the
usage of typical spectrum. The key technologies are
centred on autonomous dynamic spectrum utilization
function that is surrounded by four support functions, namely
sensing (real-time low power wideband monitoring),
characterization (rapid wafeform determination), reaction (formulate
best course of action), and adaptation (transition network
to new emission plan). Opportunistic frequency
sharing is planned to achieve by imposing policy (e.g.
rules of frequency, time to vacate, maximum power, maximum
transmit time, etc.) on all users. The policies will
define a set of abstract behaviours currently deployed manually by spectrum managers. Autonomic Communication will attempt to extend the approach of policy-based self-management to wider spectrum of network elements (host, router, middle box, end device) behaviours,
where rules governing behaviours are not
well understood and inter-relations between
elements' behaviours are not as
clear as in frequency sharing.
|
IRTF is a
research branch of the IETF, in a number
of its semi-closed working groups it attempts to find long-term
solutions for long-standing problems. The one closely related to
multiple addressing realms was recently created (and closed in
2004) Searchable Internet Resource Names (SIREN)
group. SIREN wanted to seek a tractable option
of enhancing existing Domain Name System (DNS)
with layers above to allow
"directory-like search (using qualified natural language
strings rather than names)". It seems that similar target has yet
another research group Host Identity Protocol though having more
pragmatic scope - to standardise de-coupling of names and locators; the
practical proposal is to use public key as a name part and map it to
[any] routable address. Similar group exists within IETF.
The
approach of AC will be
more radical and shall largely
follow the recently published Plutarch
abstraction that is not IPv4 or IPv6 centric but is rather
considering existing Internet as yet another
though widely deployed realm (or explicit network
'context') existing concurrently with e.g.
sensor networks, delay-tolerant networks,
etc.. Mentioned above
directory-like search will not be limited
to a single
address allocation authority (name registrar) but will be
performed in a group fashion, where potential network
contexts will return their values,
and after host's selection a needed chain of
network contexts will be established. AC
should try to extend even this radical model by allowing this
selection to be done by intermediaries located within network
context different from the one of a resolver, thus allowing not
only E2E network context transparency but also the
inside-out one.
|
| ©2004
autonomic-communication.org |